Blog
School Bus Injuries
Posted by: euser
August 03, 2007
Topic: Minnesota Personal Injury
The Minnesota legislature has enacted several statutes governing the safe operation of school buses. Additionally, the state's Commissioner of Public Safety has been authorized to adopt further rules regarding the operation of school buses, which are to have the same force and effect of law as though the state legislature had enacted them as well. The same laws apply to a bus whether it is owned and operated by the school district itself, or whether it is owned and operated by a private company under contract with the school. A school bus driver's failure to abide by one of these regulations makes a strong, if not absolute, case for negligence.
Additionally, Minnesota courts have held school districts liable for negligent operation or supervision of school buses even without the violation of an enumerated rule. School bus drivers have a heightened duty of care towards the children they are transporting because they are operating a "common carrier" (ex. airplanes, buses, passenger ships, taxicabs, trains). A common carrier must exercise the highest degree of care and foresight for the safety of its passengers consistent with the proper conduct of its business, and must take every reasonable precaution to protect the passengers from injury. This includes an obligation to have skilled and careful drivers who are alert at all times to discover and avoid danger. Moreover, a higher duty of care is also generally owed towards children than towards adults.
When letting children off the bus, a school bus driver's duty extends beyond merely activating the stop sign and flashing lights, and includes the responsibility to find a safe location for schoolchildren to depart the bus. The driver's duty continues until the children have disembarked to a place of safety. If an automobile driver fails to properly stop for a school bus and hits a child who has just departed from the bus, that automobile driver's negligence may not excuse the bus driver's failure to fulfil his duties.
Moreover, school bus drivers have a duty to reasonably supervise the activities of schoolchildren while they are on the bus. Although there is certainly no requirement to provide constant supervision, a driver may be held responsible if a student is injured by another student under circumstances where injury was reasonably foreseeable and would probably have been prevented by ordinary supervision.
News
Product Liability
[07/29] Govt to crash test 55 vehicles under new system
[07/29] Toyota recalls 412,000 cars in US, mostly Avalons
[07/26] Nap Nanny recliners recalled
[07/26] Medical device problems hurt 70,000+ kids annually
[07/22] 1.3 million Smith and Noble blinds recalled
Read More
Personal Injury
[07/30] Mont. officials await test results in bear attack
[07/30] Inmate sues man he's convicted of burglarizing
[07/30] 1,200 homes evacuated in LA Co. as fire spreads
[07/29] Bear attack in Montana leaves 1 dead, 2 injured
[07/29] APNewsBreak: Pa. diocese sued in accuser's suicide
Read More
Employment Practices
[07/29] Initial jobless claims drop to 457,000
[07/22] Elevated jobless claims point to weak labor market
[07/22] Additional jobless benefits hinge on House vote
[07/19] Obama to GOP: Restore jobless benefits
Read More
Topics
Bankruptcy Law
Minnesota Dog Bite Attorneys
Minnesota No-Fault
Minnesota No-Fault Law
Minnesota Personal Injury
Social Security Disability
Workers' Compensation
Wrongful Death
Recent Updates
July 07, 2008
Road Construction Injuries
January 24, 2008
Workers' Compensation
January 24, 2008
Dog Attacks
November 06, 2007
Possible E. coli Contamination Forces General Mills to Recall Totino?s and Jeno?s Frozen Pizzas
October 04, 2007
Minnesota Recognizes Negligent Credentialing







Back to Top






