Blog
Minnesota Legislature Update
Posted by: euser
March 15, 2007
Topic: Minnesota No-Fault Law
Two new bills have been introduced in the Minnesota Legislature in the last month regarding the Minnesota No-Fault Act. The first bill, S.F. 1309 and H.F. 1359, was introduced on February 26, 2007 by Senators Mary A. Olson (DFL - Bemidji), Dan Sparks (DFL - Austin), Dan Skogen (DFL - Hewitt), and Warren Limmer (R - Maple Grove) and Representatives Joe Atkins (DFL - Inver Grove Heights) and Joe Mullery (DFL - Minneapolis).
This bill makes several changes to the No-Fault Act. First, the bill would amend Minn. Stat. 65B.44 in several respects. Subdivision 2 would state that “medical expense benefits shall reimburse all reasonable expenses for necessary medical, surgical, x-ray, optical, dental, chiropractic, and rehabilitative services, including prosthetic devices and items that provide relief from any injury.” Second, the bill would increase the weekly maximum allowed for disability and income loss benefits, and for unemployment benefits, from $250 to $500. Third, the maximum for funeral and burial benefits would be increased from $2,000 to $5,000. Finally, the weekly maximum for replacement services and loss would be increased from $200 to $600.
Furthermore, the bill would amend Minn. Stat. 65B.47, Subd. 7, providing that policies must be added together unless the policyholder specifically elects not to do so. Finally, under Minn. Stat. 65B.54, Subd. 1, benefits would be overdue 30 days after expenses incurred, rather than after the reparation obligor receives reasonable proof of the fact and the amount of loss is realized.
The second bill, S.F. 1732 and H.F. 1999, was introduced on March 12, 2007 by Senators Sparks, James P. Metzen (DFL - South St. Paul), and Dan Larson (DFL - Bloomington) and Representatives Linda Slocum (DFL - Richfield) and Paul Thissen (DFL - Minneapolis). This bill would amend Minn. Stat. 65B.44, Subd. 2 to provide that “medical expense benefits shall reimburse all reasonable expenses for necessary…(6) first responder emergency care provided by a medical response unit, as defined in section 144E.275, subdivision 1, paragraph (a), that is registered with the Emergency Medical Services Regulatory Board under section 144E.275.” The section would take effect August 1, 2007 and apply to coverage issued or renewed on or after that date.
Both bills were referred to its respective House and Senate committees.
News
Product Liability
[07/29] Govt to crash test 55 vehicles under new system
[07/29] Toyota recalls 412,000 cars in US, mostly Avalons
[07/26] Nap Nanny recliners recalled
[07/26] Medical device problems hurt 70,000+ kids annually
[07/22] 1.3 million Smith and Noble blinds recalled
Read More
Personal Injury
[07/30] Mont. officials await test results in bear attack
[07/30] Inmate sues man he's convicted of burglarizing
[07/30] 1,200 homes evacuated in LA Co. as fire spreads
[07/29] Bear attack in Montana leaves 1 dead, 2 injured
[07/29] APNewsBreak: Pa. diocese sued in accuser's suicide
Read More
Employment Practices
[07/29] Initial jobless claims drop to 457,000
[07/22] Elevated jobless claims point to weak labor market
[07/22] Additional jobless benefits hinge on House vote
[07/19] Obama to GOP: Restore jobless benefits
Read More
Topics
Bankruptcy Law
Minnesota Dog Bite Attorneys
Minnesota No-Fault
Minnesota No-Fault Law
Minnesota Personal Injury
Social Security Disability
Workers' Compensation
Wrongful Death
Recent Updates
July 07, 2008
Road Construction Injuries
January 24, 2008
Workers' Compensation
January 24, 2008
Dog Attacks
November 06, 2007
Possible E. coli Contamination Forces General Mills to Recall Totino?s and Jeno?s Frozen Pizzas
October 04, 2007
Minnesota Recognizes Negligent Credentialing







Back to Top






